About Me

Name: Paul Derengowski
Email: paul.derengowski@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Christian Apologetics

"The system worked…We want to fix that problem."

Confused yet?  Homeland Security measures worked yesterday, only to be a problem that needs fixing today, at least according to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.  In other words, she, likes so many in the Homeland Security Office, doesn't have a clue about what really took place on Northwest Flight 253.

Oh, she knows some Nigerian (forget that he was a Muslim terrorist, and that his own father tried to warn Federal authorities about his Islamic ideology which fueled his terroristic actions) got on a plane and tried to turn it into wreckage over Detroit.  Beyond that, she's like the proverbial deer in the headlights: totally blind to reality.

First of all, since our government is now bending over backwards to appease groups like CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and the Muslim Brotherhood to subordinate the U.S. Constitution beneath Shari'a Law, the security system to protect Americans from thugs like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, Nidal Hassan, Hosam Smadi, Najibullah Zazi, Ramy Zamzam is a joke.  Not only should none of these characters ever been afforded the opportunity to step on a plane or a military base to pull the stunts that they did.  None of them, including CAIR, the ISNA, the ICNA, IIIT, MSA, Muslim Brotherhood of America, or any of the rest of them should even be allowed in this country.

Second, to be saying that there is a problem that needs to be fixed is a monumental understatement.  Persons such as Janet Napolitano should be fired, and individuals such as North Carolina senator Larry Shaw should be tried and put in prison for conspiring with the enemy, namely CAIR.  Moreover, every mosque in the United States should be placed under 24/7 electronic surveillance, and the imams and their congregations who object should be immediately deported to their favorite Muslim land where they can live out their dreams of being a real Islamist without any U.S. Constitutional hindrance.

Third, every Muslim should be profiled, and if caught breaking the law—even if it's spitting on the sidewalk—should be deported or executed, depending on the level of offense.  If deported that Muslim should be given the strict order "Don't ever come back!  You're no longer welcome here!"  If executed, then the rest of the Muslim community can thank Allah for the infidel sending the criminal (not martyr) to his reward.  At least the rest of humanity won't have to be concerned about him wreaking senseless havoc in this world anymore.

Some might say, why are you picking on the Muslims?  Let me ask in return, what was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Nidal Malik Hassans' religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Hosam Smadi's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was David Coleman Headley's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Tahawwur Husain Rana's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Tarek Mehanna's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Najibullah Zazi's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Daniel P. Boyd's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  What was Ramy Zamzam's religious affiliation?  Muslim.  These are just some of the terrorist idiots that acted in conformity with real, genuine Islamic beliefs in 2009, to either maim or kill Americans.

The list itself is actually quite a bit longer that those reported by name in the news.  And when one adds names like Dritan Duka, Shain Duka, Eljvir Duka, Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer, Serdar Tatar and Agron Abdullahu, Daniel Maldonado, Kevin James, and Jose Padilla, going back to 2002, then to be asking a question like "why are you picking on the Muslims," borders on stupidity of what is going on around them.  There is not only probable cause that the next act of terrorism will come at the hands of those in the Muslim community, failure to profile the same community, and then act justly and swiftly, is to sign one's own death warrant at the hands of these fine, wonderful, upstanding, law-abiding, "peaceful" Muslims.

Yes, the system worked, alright.  It exposed a major weakness in ideological thought.  In fact, it worked so well that it almost brought down another airliner.  Whether we choose to really fix the problem is another thing.  Frankly, until Americans have had enough of the Janet Napolitano's doublespeak, as well as the Barak Obama's that put her into office, then nothing is going to change.  And because of American unwillingness to do anything truly substantive, Muslim terrorist attacks are rising exponentially.  Don't be surprised to see or hear of another major attack on or around New Year's Day.  After all, no one should be focused solely on New Year's festivities and bowl games without a little mayhem and grief mixed in as well.  That is, at least according to the militant Muslim way of thinking and those in our government blindly protecting it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Prince of World Peace or Prelude to World War

Okay, let me see if I can get this straight. Last night I go to bed and the U.S. military needs an additional 40,000 troops in Afghanistan to fight the Islamic thugs, but the U.S. president can't make up his mind whether he wants to believe his general on the ground. The U.S. health care system is under assault by extreme left-wing socialists, also led by the same U.S. president, with a majority of the American populace sitting on the edge of their seats waiting to have the screws put to them. And finally, as already noted previously, youth violence is on the rise, and we have a U.S. president that is "committed" to ensuring that all the gang bangers and drug pushers receive a "powerful message" to make them quit it, otherwise he's going to tell on them.

Now, this morning, I wake up and this same U.S president, who has shown great prowess in campaigning and speech-making, but little to nothing of positive substance to actually do anything to be a leader, is a Nobel Peace Prize winner. What? Why? From one news source the U.S. president wins the grand booby prize for three reasons: "encourage his nascent initiatives to reduce nuclear arms, ease tensions with the Muslim world and replace unilateral American action with international diplomacy and cooperation." So, what does this really mean?

Encourage his nascent initiatives to reduce nuclear arms really means nothing more than weaken the U.S. resolve when socialist regimes want to indiscriminately throw their weight around. That way we can all be one big happy world, with one big world government, while we all exalt the big wonderful world ruler. Who knows? maybe the Nobel Prize winner will be nominated for that too!

Ease tensions with the Muslim world merely means to kow-tow to Muslim demands. One doesn't want to make the militant Jihadist angry, because when he gets angry, he starts blowing things up. And we, in our ever-growing civilized, rational, and sensitive society of humanists and rationalists can't stoop to the level of actually meeting anger with strength. We must bow to the Jihadist wishes by holding a "dialogue" with him to try and understand him, and he us, as if the past 14 centuries of Islamic history, conquest, and tyranny haven't given anyone in their right mind a crystal clear picture of just exactly what the Muslim goal and mindset are all about.

Finally, "replace unilateral American action with international diplomacy and cooperation" simply means, we want you to forget 9-11, and quit acting on your own. Again, you're not a sovereign nation anymore. And just because the U.S. was attacked on its own soil that tragic day, and lost over 3,000 citizens through the attack, doesn't mean that the U.S. should defend itself without world permission. We realize that as an international community, we don't have the guts to really get involved and solve anything, but that doesn't mean the the U.S. should even try on its own either.

This whole Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Barack Obama is a joke, is meaningless, and is typical of the blithering nonsense that has become a part of modern-day parlance. In fact, I would say it is indicative of the intellectual, moral, and spiritual vacuity that has become characteristic of the human soul that has gone seriously awry. Humanity has become so desperate to find meaning and answers to an otherwise meaningless existence that it will prop up any idol and then bow down to it, regardless of who it is. One has to wonder just how much more desperate the world will become before it starts to laud the savior Obama, not just as U.S president, nor as the Prince of Peace, but as Almighty God himself.

Clearly we are living in dangerous times. Not just because a few one-world elitists want to honor an empty suit with a meaningless award; not because the Muslims wants to dominate the world through militant Jihad; and certainly not because a bunch of socialist ideologues want to strip the U.S. of its sovereign identity. We're living in dangerous times because many know what is right, but don't have the mental acumen, spiritual conviction, or moral backbone to stand up and defend what is right. Shame on us for we are getting exactly what our ignorance, shallowness, and cowardice have bought us. We have sown the wind, and now we're reaping the whirlwind. With Obama now seen as the exalted man of world peace, one has to wonder if we're not on the precipice of world war. But, then maybe that will be the not-so-surprising surprise that I'll wake up to tomorrow morning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »