About Me

Name: Paul Derengowski
Email: paul.derengowski@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Christian Apologetics

"What can we do?"

A concerned friend, after reading one of my blog entries involving the subversion of America by militant Islam, asked me a very important question: What can we do?  Instead of tackling the question by way of a short response, I thought it was important enough to do a completely separate blog entry, and see if there is a solution to the mess we're in as a country.

First of all, from a biblical perspective, the question "What can we do?" is similar to one that King David asked when he saw wickedness abounding in his day.  He asked, "If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?" (Ps. 11:3).  Two things are worth noting from his question.  First, the practice of righteousness requires a solid foundation.  Second, only the righteous can do anything to restore order to an otherwise chaotic situation.  Nevertheless, lets take these one at a time and expound upon them.

The practice of doing what is right requires a solid foundation.  Doing what is right implies moral and ethical decision-making.  Not only must the moral and ethical foundation be beyond mere human opinion, it must be reliable and stable under all conditions.  It must be trustworthy and authoritative.  At one time America had such a foundation.  It was called the Bible, for that is what she was built upon.  Although there was no national church or religion, nor was there ever the intent to build one, still those who wrote our Constitution and Bill of Rights were indebted to the Bible's principles as the only way to ensure life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

That foundation, though, with the advent of Enlightenment and Postmodern thought, has since deteriorated, at least in the hearts many now claiming to be both Christians and Americans.  What we're seeing today in the forms of corrupt government, financial irresponsibility, political correctness, religious and cultural diversity, dumbed-down education (at all levels), an overindulging preoccupation with entertainment, and on, and on, and on, are the outgrowths of those advents and deterioration.  Many of us are dying from within, and we either don't know it, nor we don't care.  That foundational attitude must change if things are going to get any better.

Second, only the righteous can do what is necessary to right a nation.  But, who are the righteous?  They are those whom God has redeemed and justified by His grace.  They uphold the biblical foundation as the only objective standard by which a nation can survive when the enemies of liberty come knocking at its door.  Our Founding Fathers understood this, which is why so many of them were avowed Christians.  Of course, there are going to be the naysayers, mockers, and critics who will object to such an assertion.  They want to rewrite history and secularize it to the point where God is excluded from the conversation.  Our Founding Fathers are re-visioned as atheists and agnostics as worst, and irreverent deists at best, all of which is pure non-sense.  Perhaps the best way to silence such critics is to simply ask them what their objective standard is to today's problems, and then sit back and listen to the crickets chirp.  For despite all their arrogant bravado and revisionism, when push comes to shove, the critics of Christian America and its founders end up being nothing more than the contributors to the problems, and not the solution makers.

Does this mean that non-Christians and non-Christian religious ideologies cannot contribute to the righteousness of righting a nation?  They may contribute, but for true righteousness to reign, their contributions must garner biblical support, otherwise before long, that nation will be experiencing the very thing America is seeing today: corruption and confusion run amok.  Is that pointing a finger at certain groups and ideas as the root causes of today's American meltdown?  Yes.  Christians for not doing what is right are as responsible for America's problems as those non-Christians who argued for a better path, the latter of which was rife with self-serving, self-centered subjectivism that only led to self-destruction, and ultimately the destruction of America.

Therefore, what can we do?  As far as President Obama is concerned, there is nothing that Christians can do except to pray for him.  Although that may sound trite, it is (1) biblical, and (2) the only thing that can be done, since the foundations for doing what is right are tenuous at best.  In fact, America has gone so long in engaging in anti-intellectual thought when it comes to its Christian identity, with many Christians and organizations all but isolating themselves from the rest of society, and another lot so caught up in emotively-inspired practices and self-help seminars, that it may be decades in the making before America is ready to claim that she is a Christian nation again.  We're that far gone at this time.

Oh, it's not that we're not seeing some righteous indignation on the part of "Christians" taking place at these so-called "Tea Parties" and the like, but I would venture to guess that that they, like so many knee-jerk reactions are more about stirring the emotions, than about substantive thought about one's spiritual convictions.  It is the same emotional mentality which led to the placing of Obama in the Whitehouse in the first place.  And now many of those same people think that by having another emotional rally they're going to stop the tide from washing them away?  I don't think so.  Just look at what Congress is doing with the health care legislation.

Does that sound bleak?  hopeless?  dire?  Absolutely.  But, it is reality.  Until the biblical foundations are restored, there is nothing the righteous can do.  It is going to take work.  It is going to take thought.  It is going to take sweat, just like when a foundation is being poured for a new house.  Nevertheless, it must be done to erect a lasting structure.  Without it the nation is attempting to build a society upon shifting sand.  And when the storms come and the tides rise, that society is destroyed, due to its lack of something solid to stand upon.

Finally, if the righteous are the only ones with a solution for the reconstructing of the foundation to answer the problems facing the country, yet they continue to fail to do anything substantive to build that foundation and correct those problems, then one may rest assure that the unrighteous will eventually lead the nation to its destruction.  What we're now seeing is the culmination of years of touchy-feely subjectivism that has been part of  "Christian" America.  The worst is yet to come, if the righteous don't get with the program and build.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Prince of World Peace or Prelude to World War

Okay, let me see if I can get this straight. Last night I go to bed and the U.S. military needs an additional 40,000 troops in Afghanistan to fight the Islamic thugs, but the U.S. president can't make up his mind whether he wants to believe his general on the ground. The U.S. health care system is under assault by extreme left-wing socialists, also led by the same U.S. president, with a majority of the American populace sitting on the edge of their seats waiting to have the screws put to them. And finally, as already noted previously, youth violence is on the rise, and we have a U.S. president that is "committed" to ensuring that all the gang bangers and drug pushers receive a "powerful message" to make them quit it, otherwise he's going to tell on them.

Now, this morning, I wake up and this same U.S president, who has shown great prowess in campaigning and speech-making, but little to nothing of positive substance to actually do anything to be a leader, is a Nobel Peace Prize winner. What? Why? From one news source the U.S. president wins the grand booby prize for three reasons: "encourage his nascent initiatives to reduce nuclear arms, ease tensions with the Muslim world and replace unilateral American action with international diplomacy and cooperation." So, what does this really mean?

Encourage his nascent initiatives to reduce nuclear arms really means nothing more than weaken the U.S. resolve when socialist regimes want to indiscriminately throw their weight around. That way we can all be one big happy world, with one big world government, while we all exalt the big wonderful world ruler. Who knows? maybe the Nobel Prize winner will be nominated for that too!

Ease tensions with the Muslim world merely means to kow-tow to Muslim demands. One doesn't want to make the militant Jihadist angry, because when he gets angry, he starts blowing things up. And we, in our ever-growing civilized, rational, and sensitive society of humanists and rationalists can't stoop to the level of actually meeting anger with strength. We must bow to the Jihadist wishes by holding a "dialogue" with him to try and understand him, and he us, as if the past 14 centuries of Islamic history, conquest, and tyranny haven't given anyone in their right mind a crystal clear picture of just exactly what the Muslim goal and mindset are all about.

Finally, "replace unilateral American action with international diplomacy and cooperation" simply means, we want you to forget 9-11, and quit acting on your own. Again, you're not a sovereign nation anymore. And just because the U.S. was attacked on its own soil that tragic day, and lost over 3,000 citizens through the attack, doesn't mean that the U.S. should defend itself without world permission. We realize that as an international community, we don't have the guts to really get involved and solve anything, but that doesn't mean the the U.S. should even try on its own either.

This whole Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Barack Obama is a joke, is meaningless, and is typical of the blithering nonsense that has become a part of modern-day parlance. In fact, I would say it is indicative of the intellectual, moral, and spiritual vacuity that has become characteristic of the human soul that has gone seriously awry. Humanity has become so desperate to find meaning and answers to an otherwise meaningless existence that it will prop up any idol and then bow down to it, regardless of who it is. One has to wonder just how much more desperate the world will become before it starts to laud the savior Obama, not just as U.S president, nor as the Prince of Peace, but as Almighty God himself.

Clearly we are living in dangerous times. Not just because a few one-world elitists want to honor an empty suit with a meaningless award; not because the Muslims wants to dominate the world through militant Jihad; and certainly not because a bunch of socialist ideologues want to strip the U.S. of its sovereign identity. We're living in dangerous times because many know what is right, but don't have the mental acumen, spiritual conviction, or moral backbone to stand up and defend what is right. Shame on us for we are getting exactly what our ignorance, shallowness, and cowardice have bought us. We have sown the wind, and now we're reaping the whirlwind. With Obama now seen as the exalted man of world peace, one has to wonder if we're not on the precipice of world war. But, then maybe that will be the not-so-surprising surprise that I'll wake up to tomorrow morning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »