About Me

Name: Paul Derengowski
Email: paul.derengowski@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Christian Apologetics

"What can we do?"

A concerned friend, after reading one of my blog entries involving the subversion of America by militant Islam, asked me a very important question: What can we do?  Instead of tackling the question by way of a short response, I thought it was important enough to do a completely separate blog entry, and see if there is a solution to the mess we're in as a country.

First of all, from a biblical perspective, the question "What can we do?" is similar to one that King David asked when he saw wickedness abounding in his day.  He asked, "If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?" (Ps. 11:3).  Two things are worth noting from his question.  First, the practice of righteousness requires a solid foundation.  Second, only the righteous can do anything to restore order to an otherwise chaotic situation.  Nevertheless, lets take these one at a time and expound upon them.

The practice of doing what is right requires a solid foundation.  Doing what is right implies moral and ethical decision-making.  Not only must the moral and ethical foundation be beyond mere human opinion, it must be reliable and stable under all conditions.  It must be trustworthy and authoritative.  At one time America had such a foundation.  It was called the Bible, for that is what she was built upon.  Although there was no national church or religion, nor was there ever the intent to build one, still those who wrote our Constitution and Bill of Rights were indebted to the Bible's principles as the only way to ensure life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

That foundation, though, with the advent of Enlightenment and Postmodern thought, has since deteriorated, at least in the hearts many now claiming to be both Christians and Americans.  What we're seeing today in the forms of corrupt government, financial irresponsibility, political correctness, religious and cultural diversity, dumbed-down education (at all levels), an overindulging preoccupation with entertainment, and on, and on, and on, are the outgrowths of those advents and deterioration.  Many of us are dying from within, and we either don't know it, nor we don't care.  That foundational attitude must change if things are going to get any better.

Second, only the righteous can do what is necessary to right a nation.  But, who are the righteous?  They are those whom God has redeemed and justified by His grace.  They uphold the biblical foundation as the only objective standard by which a nation can survive when the enemies of liberty come knocking at its door.  Our Founding Fathers understood this, which is why so many of them were avowed Christians.  Of course, there are going to be the naysayers, mockers, and critics who will object to such an assertion.  They want to rewrite history and secularize it to the point where God is excluded from the conversation.  Our Founding Fathers are re-visioned as atheists and agnostics as worst, and irreverent deists at best, all of which is pure non-sense.  Perhaps the best way to silence such critics is to simply ask them what their objective standard is to today's problems, and then sit back and listen to the crickets chirp.  For despite all their arrogant bravado and revisionism, when push comes to shove, the critics of Christian America and its founders end up being nothing more than the contributors to the problems, and not the solution makers.

Does this mean that non-Christians and non-Christian religious ideologies cannot contribute to the righteousness of righting a nation?  They may contribute, but for true righteousness to reign, their contributions must garner biblical support, otherwise before long, that nation will be experiencing the very thing America is seeing today: corruption and confusion run amok.  Is that pointing a finger at certain groups and ideas as the root causes of today's American meltdown?  Yes.  Christians for not doing what is right are as responsible for America's problems as those non-Christians who argued for a better path, the latter of which was rife with self-serving, self-centered subjectivism that only led to self-destruction, and ultimately the destruction of America.

Therefore, what can we do?  As far as President Obama is concerned, there is nothing that Christians can do except to pray for him.  Although that may sound trite, it is (1) biblical, and (2) the only thing that can be done, since the foundations for doing what is right are tenuous at best.  In fact, America has gone so long in engaging in anti-intellectual thought when it comes to its Christian identity, with many Christians and organizations all but isolating themselves from the rest of society, and another lot so caught up in emotively-inspired practices and self-help seminars, that it may be decades in the making before America is ready to claim that she is a Christian nation again.  We're that far gone at this time.

Oh, it's not that we're not seeing some righteous indignation on the part of "Christians" taking place at these so-called "Tea Parties" and the like, but I would venture to guess that that they, like so many knee-jerk reactions are more about stirring the emotions, than about substantive thought about one's spiritual convictions.  It is the same emotional mentality which led to the placing of Obama in the Whitehouse in the first place.  And now many of those same people think that by having another emotional rally they're going to stop the tide from washing them away?  I don't think so.  Just look at what Congress is doing with the health care legislation.

Does that sound bleak?  hopeless?  dire?  Absolutely.  But, it is reality.  Until the biblical foundations are restored, there is nothing the righteous can do.  It is going to take work.  It is going to take thought.  It is going to take sweat, just like when a foundation is being poured for a new house.  Nevertheless, it must be done to erect a lasting structure.  Without it the nation is attempting to build a society upon shifting sand.  And when the storms come and the tides rise, that society is destroyed, due to its lack of something solid to stand upon.

Finally, if the righteous are the only ones with a solution for the reconstructing of the foundation to answer the problems facing the country, yet they continue to fail to do anything substantive to build that foundation and correct those problems, then one may rest assure that the unrighteous will eventually lead the nation to its destruction.  What we're now seeing is the culmination of years of touchy-feely subjectivism that has been part of  "Christian" America.  The worst is yet to come, if the righteous don't get with the program and build.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Comparing Apples & The Sword

In our postmodern age of biblical illiteracy it is not uncommon to see Christianity and Christian beliefs marginalized or equated with other religious beliefs, as if all religious beliefs had the same basis for functioning as they do.  How many times have you heard the religiously naive and politically correct state, "All spiritual paths lead to the same source"?  Not only is such a comment patently untrue, it is clearly in opposition to Jesus' statement, "I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6).

When one turns to more serious matters, such as the growing crises that the Muslim world is foisting upon the rest of society, particularly in the forms of killing innocent people in the name of Islam, the naivete and ignorance is exacerbated.  The exception, though, is that those doing the equating this time are not only the biblically illiterate and religiously naive, it is the atheist/agnostic crowd, who think that by exploiting what they think are parallels beliefs and practices, which result in people dying, then their particular brand of inanity will look that much better.

But, a careful examination of the facts will show that not only is there no comparison between Islam and Christianity, there is instead a distinct equation between Islam and Atheism!  Lets look at a couple of examples.
  •  Jesus Christ lived a perfect life.  He was God incarnate, and even admitted as much (Jn 8:58; 10:30; 11:45).  He never harmed a soul, nor did he ever command any of his followers to ever perpetrate an act of violence upon anyone.  In fact, several times throughout Jesus' ministry he was personally attacked and never retaliated.  And the one time that one of Jesus' followers (Peter) took up a sword and cut off a high priest's ear for attempting to arrest Jesus on false charges, Jesus not only healed the high priest, but told Peter, "Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword" (Mt. 26:52). 
  • Muhammad, on the other hand, was anything but perfect.  He never claimed to be God incarnate, never performed a miracle, and propagated doctrines about God that, biblically speaking, made him false prophet (Dt. 13:1-3).  Moreover, throughout his short life, Muhammad not only personally murdered people with the sword, he openly condoned such, by ordering his followers to fight, kill, and subdue anyone who would not accept Muhammad's religion of forced submission.  "Fight against those who believe not in Allah…and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued (Qur'an 9:29).  "So, when you meet (in fight—Jihad in Allah's Cause) those who disbelieve, smite (their) necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)" (47:4).  "o.8.4  There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die) (Reliance of the Traveller, 596, which is an authoritative volume on Sharia Law).
  • Christian History.  Critics of Christianity, and religion in general, often like to point to what they consider a long history of bloodshed perpetrated in the name of God.  That because of those who have died at the hands of those claiming to be Christians, that that somehow condemns the whole movement as being nothing better than what Islam, or any other religion, has to offer. 
Typically the Old Testament slaughter of pagan elements in Israel's history and the Crusades are cited as "Aha!  See, I told you so," types of examples.  Yet, both examples are fundamentally flawed.  First of all, the sin being openly committed and practiced by the Canaanites at the time the Jews conquered the Promised Land was so heinous, disgusting, and full of debauchery that the only way God's people would be prevented from the taint of that environment was to destroy them.  It is nothing different than when God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah or the earth by the flood.  Second, the Crusades were not about Christian oppression of anyone, nor conquering the world.  It was about fighting back against the Muslim onslaught that managed to take not only Jerusalem by force, but much of the Middle East, and the Mediterranean and Southern European worlds.  In fact, by and large the Crusades were a failure.
  • Islamic History.  Muhammad initially started out by petitioning the Quraysh to give up their idols and idolatrous ways, and was laughed at.  He was finally pressured to leave Mecca and reside in Medina, where through a series of treacherous raids he managed to finally build up an army where he could take his own revenge upon the Meccans.  His whole modus operandi, in other words, after he left Mecca the first time changed from preaching peace to preaching conquest by the sword.  And conquer by the sword he did.  Those who dared to get out from underneath his tyrannical thumb met a perilous fate, as the 600-900 Jews did when he personally executed them by beheading after the battle of the trench.  His caliphs who succeeded him were no less treacherous as they marauded their ways across North Africa, the Middle East, and all the way up into France, where they were stopped at the Battle of Tours by Charles Martel.  And given the Qur'an's mandate of conquest by force, we may expect more of the same, until either the world is dominated by Islamic oppression, it is held in check by force or by conversion, or the Lord returns and destroys it.
  •  Atheist Oppression and Murder.  It is no big secret that during the 20th century that atheistic Communism managed to murder more people (75-100 million) than had died in all the Christian wars and conflicts the previous two-thousand years.  What is interesting is that atheistic communism thrives on the same oppressive ideology as does Islam, and that is if one doesn't want to have anything to do with the system, then force is used to subdue the people to comply at the risk of dying.  Of course, both ideologies and their adherents frequently cry "foul" over drawing such a comparison, but the historical and doctrinal records speak for themselves.  In fact, Naziism, despite all its quasi-religious ties, was essentially nothing more than an atheistic system as well.  Therefore, it should come as no big surprise that during Hitler's rampage a prominent Muslim leader, Haj Amin al-Husseini, would meet with Hitler to plot a way to oppress and exterminate the Jews during World War II.
  • The gods of Atheism & Islam. One might be taken aback for a moment at the thought of an atheist acknowledging the existence of a god, much less one on par with the Muslim.  After all, don't Muslims worship the same God as the Jews and Christians?  First of all, the atheist does worship a god.  In fact, depending on the number of atheists in a room will depend on the number of gods that could be worshiped at any given time.  That is because the atheist by denying God's existence must prop himself up as a god to do it.  He must take on all the characteristics and attributes of God in order to positively and completely deny Him.  The atheist may posture and sneer that he has to do any such thing, but simply using a little deductive reasoning makes the conclusion irrefutable.
The Muslim, on the other hand, worships a god, that is not only unlike Yahweh or Jesus, but is so unapproachable as to be unknowable.  Oh, it may have 99 names, and there may be only one of it (at least in theory), but as far as establishing any kind of relationship with it or having any kind of assurance that one has done enough to warrant standing in its presence one day forgiven of one's sins, the Muslim is out of luck.  One might as well be worshiping oneself, for he will never meet this "god."  And since that is the case, the Muslim god no more exists, as a metaphysical reality, than does the atheist's god.
So, is Christianity comparable to Islam?  Only if one ignores the facts about founders, the histories, and where the real comparisons are.  Jesus was nothing like Muhammad, nor was Muhammad anything like Jesus.  Jesus was God in the flesh who came to redeem mankind.  Muhammad merely acted in flesh, as his own little god, to oppress and murder people.  Although Christianity has Old Testament ties through the Jews, and some Christians have been guilty of acting like Peter, in no possible way has biblical Christianity ever sanctioned violence against anybody.  Islam, on the other hand, has been an oppressive and murderous cult from its inception.  Not only does it sanction violence against the unbeliever, it actually rewards such behavior with the only promise of attaining heaven one day if one dies as a martyr in the act of jihad against the infidel (Qur'an 9:111).  Finally, if one is to compare worldviews, one would find more support to compare the ideologies of atheism and Islam, than one will ever find between Christianity and Islam.  For if one compares atheism with Islam, at least then one is comparing apples with apples, rather than apples with the sword, as would be the case if one compared Christianity with Islam.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"God is dead…And we have killed him."

The sobering words of the eccentric philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche over 120 years ago in Europe are ever-becoming more true in America today.  "God is dead.  God remains dead.  And we have killed him."  Unfortunately, too many want to pretend otherwise, and then whine and complain about freedoms lost, immorality run amok, fiscal irresponsibility and fraud, or whatever happens to be the most sensational news item of the day.

It wasn't that Nietzsche actually believed that God was literally dead as a being.  What he meant was that by how humans tend to go about their lives, for all practical purposes, God was a irrelevant afterthought.  He didn't really exist anymore as a central figure in people's thought processes and planning.  People had become practical atheists.  Oh, allusions might be made to "a god" in a sensuous thrill of vague religiosity, but after the temporal orgasm of subjective spirituality had subsided, all that was left was an empty shell, a caricature if you will, of a being who had long since died due to neglect.  Europe today is now reaping the consequences of killing off God, and Western American countries are not far behind in reaping the same.

A sad, but telling, indication that Americans are slowly murdering God is through their addiction to politics as the panacea to everything.  If the politician isn't looked upon as the savior to provide jobs and social welfare, then he/she is lobbied to provide universal health care.  And if the politician isn't looked upon as the great physician, then he/she is lobbied to pass legislation to dictate what is proper religious speech and practice.  

To makes things worse, day-after-day-after-day one cannot avoid being bombarded by the incessant, monotonous, and insipid political banter in the media.  Mindless automatons constantly fill the airwaves with enough disjointed rhetoric, theorizing, and blather to sicken the heartiest soul.  And why?  Because as J. P. Moreland once wrote, politics is the "surrogate for a Higher Power."  Since we, as a society, have collectively terminated any genuine relationship with that "Higher Power," then we have created a vacuum in our souls.  Man has become the measure of all things, in other words, and by severing our relationship with God, now man needs to find a replacement, and politics is that cheap substitute.

The problems, though, with relying on political chatter, minus God, to resolve anything are obvious.  There is absolutely zero objectivity in the decisions made, since everything revolves around almighty opinion.  There is endless bureaucracy, confusion, and mayhem due to the lack of a credible standard to measure the commentary.  Moreover, resources are wasted, corruption of moral values become the norm, and society itself begins to self-destruct in a free-for-all trying to make sense out of nonsense.

To make things worse, God's murderers fork over millions of dollars every year to keep the political talking heads chattering on the public airwaves, falsely assuming that if they can only get the right political figure elected into office, then that will cure all our problems.  Such an empty-headed self-delusion as that is as pathetic as saying that so long as a person doesn't hit the ground after jumping out of an airplane, then that person is flying.  Nevertheless, we often love our delusions to the point where we're willing to take a Kirkegaardian "leap of faith," even though we have no idea where we're leaping to, nor do we care.

Yes, God is dead…and we have killed him.  All that is left now is to bury him.  But, amid our delusion and pride, that isn't going to happen.  We'll just keep on ignoring his dead carcass, or maybe even prop it up as an idol to go along with the rest of the idols we've erected along the way, including politics.  And when our children, or children's children look back and see what we did to kill God, maybe by then they won't be as ashamed of Him as we currently are; they'll destroy the dead idols, and realize that God wasn't dead after all.  We were.  We just refused to admit it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »