About Me

Name: Paul Derengowski
Email: paul.derengowski@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Christian Apologetics

Are kids Angrier?

A little over a week ago a riot broke out in a Chicago area school, with the result that 16 year-old student was beaten to death.  In a Reuter's article the search is on to try and discover the "root" for not only the teen's death, but for violence in the U.S. in general.  Yet, neither the death, nor the violence is what piqued my interest when I read through the article.  The question, "Are kids angrier?" did.

Are kids angrier than they used to be?  If so, why?  Speculation coming from the article suggests that Yes; kids are angrier.  The reasons?  Violence at home.  Violence on streets.  Money woes.  Even video games are given some of the credit for making kids more angry and violent than years ago.  But, since the article is talking about root causes, are those really adequate explanations of why a High School kid would take a wooden board and whack a 16 year-old in the back of the head, knocking him to the ground, and then have several other students stomp him to death?  I don't think so.

Imagine a culture where for fifteen to twenty years of life children have it ingrained in them that there is no real purpose in life.  That when their 70 or 80 years are lived, the best they can hope for is nothing.

Imagine that same culture inculcating into its children that they are nothing more than accidents of nature, and in fact, are nothing more than higher level animals.  That survival of the fittest and natural selection are the only reasons they're still alive, and that in order to succeed in life one must adopt a "dog eat dog" mentality.

Imagine a culture of children who are taught relativistic principles concerning right and wrong, truth and error, moral and immoral, from the time when they're barely able to tie their shoes until the time they're about to marry.  Where "judge not that ye be not judged" is the perverse mantra of the day used by those who have no idea just how self-refuting such a perversion truly is.

Imagine that same culture of children who have grown up watching moms and dads live hypocritical lives, and listen to quasi-Christian ministers preach and teach empty, shallow, narcissistic sermons and lessons.  Where Christian moms and dads put on an air of religiosity on Sunday, but Monday through Saturday moms and dads indulge themselves with the finest things the world has to offer, including legalized gambling (the Lottery), watching television (the average person will spend 12 continuous years sitting and watching TV in his/her lifetime), and soft or hardcore pornography (50% of Christian men and 20% of Christian women are addicted to pornography).

Finally, imagine a culture of children who are inundated daily by fragmented information, whether on their black berries, television, YouTube, or whatever, which is delivered with the underlying premise that unless it's entertaining, then it just isn't worth considering.  Where the quiet contemplative life is replaced by the next text message, the iTune download, or the latest Taylor Swift video.

The fact is kids are angrier, not because they're any more poor than they used to be.  They're not any more angrier because of video games.  In fact, they're not any more angrier because mom and dad are.  Kids are angrier because they've been sold a faulty bill of goods in the form of irresponsible, fallacious, self-centered living by dopey parents and educators, and the children are rebelling against it.

I've often said that many of our children are smarter than the adults simply because they can spot a fraud much easier than the adults can, and many times the children don't even know they're doing it.  How is that possible?  By how the children emulate the adults, including their parents.  The exception is that through sheer innocence of a fallen nature, many of those children carry out the fraud to its logical conclusion, with the unfortunate result being that some of those same children don't live long enough to tell about it.

Children, in other words, inherently know there is something wrong when moms and dads don't know when to tell the children No!  Children inherently know that there is something wrong with the "If it feels good, do it" mentality.  Children know there is something wrong when they're told that they're nothing more than an evolved monkey.  And that knowledge festers to a boiling point, where finally the child erupts in self-defense against all the irrationality, lies, and distortions.  Sometimes it's self-destructive; at other times others are destroyed, whether it be a friend, family member (mom, dad, or both), or a complete rank stranger.  One report is that the 16 year-old Chicago student was killed by friend.

So, are kids angrier?  Absolutely.  Do they have a right to be angrier?  Again, absolutely.  Wouldn't you, if you had been told a pack of lies for fifteen to twenty years of your life?  Does this mean that one should condone their expression of anger?  Not necessarily, but it is certainly understandable.  What can be done about it?  According to the Reuter's article, join a gang and go to prison, which I think is totally preposterous.  In fact, it is that type of mentality that is helping to fuel the anger.

The solution is to change the worldview of those teaching our children, both parents and educators.  But that isn't going to happen until a majority of real genuine Christians get off their dead lead butts and change their worldview to make it more consistent with what they claim to be.  And since that isn't likely to happen anytime soon, then we're destined to see more of what happened in Chicago a week ago, in Tyler, Texas before that, and at Columbine in Colorado several years ago.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Glenn Beck's "Twelve Values": Friendship

Friendship. We all know what friendship is, but how many real friends do we have? We're researching out now in virtual friendships and everything else. We need to expand our circle of friendship. We need to start trusting one another again. We need to start seeing our neighbors again. We need to -- have you considered that if things melted down who your neighbors are? Do you trust them? Do they trust you? Can you count on each other? Our grandparents counted on each other. They counted on the neighbor. They would bring each other pies and they would share what they had. They would help each other. A lot of people would look at that, "Oh, my gosh, he was talking about, oh, it's going to break down so bad that it's going to be..." that's a good thing. As much as I hated that little street that I wrote about in my book The Christmas Sweater that my grandparents lived on, as much as I hated that when I was a kid, I'd give my right arm to live on that street again where everybody knew each other, everybody worked together. It was like a big family on that little street. While I don't have to move there, why aren't all of our streets like that now? In time I believe they're going to become those streets again and many will say that's a bad thing. Many will avoid it and they will stand in the bar there in the Titanic and you will just quietly be there to say, "Come on, into the boat. It's going to be okay." And then we will all go to shore, put our lives back in order and build a better boat.—Glenn Beck

The last of Glenn Beck's values is his rambling comments about friendship. When all is said and done, be a friend. No matter how many lies, distortions, or deceptions have been told, be a friend. Regardless if one has attempted to undermine the values, virtues, and verities of another through subtle equivocation, contradictory logic, and sleight of hand manipulation of words and meanings, be a friend. Even if the end of what one is telling another leads that person straight to hell, be a friend. That is the kind of friend that Glenn Beck wants to be to everyone.

Now, there are going to be those who will say, "But he's such a nice guy. How can you possibly say that he is not being sincere in his offer of friendship? Why cannot you just take him at his word?" First of all let me say that niceness and sincerity have nothing to do with genuineness, particularly if this nice, fun-loving, jovial person on the outside is speaking with a forked tongue. The writer E. C. McKenzie made this very point when he wrote, "A true friend is like a good book—the inside is better than the cover." So, it doesn't matter what Glenn Beck looks like on the outside; what matters is what's on the inside; and throughout this series of critiques he has been anything but friendly. Oh, friendly like a wolf in sheep's clothing, but that is hardly the kind of friend anyone in their right minds should be cherishing. People tend to get hurt, badly, with friends like that.

Another reason why a sensible person cannot take Glenn Beck seriously is because he has not been forthright in discussing the foundation of his beliefs. Instead, he has done all he could to speak Mormonese and then gloss it over with great sounding words of conservatism, patriotism, and the American way. In fact, he is doing what Mitt Romney did a few months ago when he was running for the Presidency of the United States. When asked about his Mormonism, he dodged, evaded, and obfuscated the questions. To me, anytime a person feels the needs to elude the truth, and then turn around and lie behind my back, then that person is not someone who can be trusted, much less can that person be a friend.

This, of course, does not mean that a Christian cannot be a friend to those who are not Christians. Jesus obviously associated with sinners, and we know that the apostle Paul had friends who were "of the Asiarchs" that were not Christians as well (Acts 19:31). But, that is the Christian making the decision based on wisdom and discernment. Neither Jesus nor his disciples compromised their standards to be friendly with those who were adversarial toward them and their message. In fact, James, Jesus' brother, warned against friendship with the world by stating that such friendship amounted to becoming an enemy of God's (James 4:4).

What it does mean is that since Glenn Beck, and those like him, cannot be upfront and truthful about what it is that they're otherwise covertly feeding people, then whatever friendship he and they are offering should be taken with a grain of salt. Moreover, no one should be afraid to question anyone's motives that are not clearly set forth at the outset, particularly when a Glenn Beck-type is trying to convince anyone about moral-ethical issues. Why? Because once again, a person's worldview will dictate the meaning behind the moral-ethical definitions he is intending to convey. There is no separation or division between that worldview and how he conducts his politics, his family life, or how he purchases a new car. It is all interrelated. And since Glenn Beck's worldview is heavily influenced by Mormonism, then as already seen, whatever he has to say about friends, friendliness, or friendship will be colored by that same worldview.

Therefore, in conclusion, while Glenn Beck advocates what appear to be two lists of principles and values that most normal people could agree upon, after going below the surface of general, if not simply incoherent, statements it is quite evident that those principles and values are anything but normal. Each and every point is loaded with ulterior meanings which ultimately go back to a worldview that is intimately connected to fantasies about gods and goddesses procreating humanoid figures, satanic beings filially related to Jesus, superstitious undergarments, Masonic symbolism, and on, and on, and on. 

What is perhaps the worst aspect of all of this is the fact that Beck has failed miserably in divulging all of this to his audience. But, he still wants to be everyone's friend. Well, I have a suggestion. Until Beck comes clean, and then repents of his error, then please don't expect me, or anyone else, to be his friend. My friends don't pull the bait-n-switch on me, and they certainly don't have a problem telling me the truth. Glenn Beck, on the other hand, has not only pulled all kinds of switcheroos, but has a great aversion to telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, mainly because he doesn't know what the absolute truth is; and as the saying goes, "with friends like that, who needs enemies?"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »